Explore

Recherche dans les fonds juridiques anciens numérisés par la BNF (API Gallica, sans clé) : débats parlementaires du JO depuis 1871, doctrine d'origine (Sirey, Dalloz, thèses du XIXe), jurisprudence ancienne (Bulletins civil et criminel, Lebon, Gazette des tribunaux), JO Lois et décrets 1881-2015. Chaque résultat est localisé à la page avec extrait océrisé et lien pérenne vers le fac-similé. Utilisez cette skill dès que l'utilisateur cherche l'origine historique d'un texte, d'un concept ou d'une jurisprudence, ou toute source antérieure aux bases modernes.

Gratuit et open source, LibreJustice est le seul connecteur dont vous aurez besoin pour le droit français : ~3,7 millions de décisions des deux ordres et ~3,6 millions d'articles de loi dans la même base, reliés article par article. Jurisprudence administrative et judiciaire, Conseil constitutionnel, CEDH, CJUE et CNDA. Les textes se lisent tels qu'en vigueur à n'importe quelle date, avec l'historique de leurs versions : codes et lois, Journal officiel, conventions collectives, circulaires, BOFiP, droit de l'UE, traités, codes étrangers de 59 pays. Le graphe des citations se remonte dans les deux sens : d'une décision vers les articles qu'elle cite, d'un article vers les décisions qui l'appliquent. Recherche en langage naturel, hybride lexicale et sémantique. Connexion OAuth sans clé à coller, corpus mis à jour quotidiennement.

Assistant de recherche juridique (librejustice.fr) : serveur MCP distant avec OAuth automatique + skills — jurisprudence et normes (codes, traités, UE, droit étranger).

Find and quote statutory and regulatory law with the LibreJustice MCP tools — French codes at any date, EU law, treaties and bilateral accords, foreign codes (59 countries), collective agreements, BOFiP, circulaires. Use whenever the user asks what a text says or said at a given date, which version or which text applies to a situation, needs the exact wording of a provision for a brief, or works with foreign or international law in French litigation, even if they never mention LibreJustice.

Search and cite French case law and statutes with the LibreJustice MCP tools. Use whenever the user asks about French or European court decisions (Cour de cassation, Conseil d'État, cours d'appel, TJ/TA, CNDA, Conseil constitutionnel, CNIL, CEDH, CJUE), needs authorities for a brief, requête, référé or consultation, wants to check how courts rule on an issue, needs counts of decisions on a point, or asks what a code article says at a given date, even if they never mention LibreJustice.

Checks the formal coherence and plausibility of Italian and EU legal citations (statutes, case law) in text produced by Claude or other legal-AI skills. Reports clause-by-clause on what is well-formed, suspicious, or unresolvable against real norms, covering Cassazione, Corte Costituzionale, Consiglio di Stato, TAR, Normattiva, EUR-Lex, Garante Privacy, AGCM, ANAC. Minimal-surface variant: no proprietary backend fetch, allowlist limited to official Italian and EU institutional registries.

Recherche de jurisprudence et analyse statistique à partir de décisions du fond (droit français) selon différents modules (dommage corporel, rupture du contrat de travail, baux commerciaux, droit de la construction...). Recherches qualitatives de décisions de la Cour de cassation. Permet de répondre à des questions telles que : - quelle est l'indemnisation médiane du préjudice d'agrément pour les victimes de plus de 60 ans ? - le taux horaire de la tierce personne est-il plus élevé à Paris ou à Versailles ? - donne moi les décisions donnant l'indemnisation la plus haute en cas de harcèlement au travail - quelles sont les décisions de la cour de cassation rendues au visa du principe de la réparation intégrale ?

Skill for legal research on Italian and EU sources: legislation, administrative practice, and case law. Encode a working method, not an opinion: routing to official sources, citations with verifiable references, validity checks including ratione temporis, query minimization for contexts covered by professional secrecy, and concise output by default. The Agent Skills format is an open standard: the skill was created for Claude (claude.ai, Desktop, Cowork, Claude Code) and is reusable in tools that adopt the same format.

Ansvar Gateway is a single MCP endpoint for regulatory compliance work. Ask for the law and it returns the actual provisions — GDPR, NIS2, the EU AI Act, DORA, CRA, and national statutes across the EU and dozens of other jurisdictions, plus standards, case law, preparatory works, and regulator guidance. Every row carries a paragraph-level citation with source URL, publisher, and license, fetched from the official publisher, never a mirror. It also serves live CVE/KEV/EPSS vulnerability data and MITRE ATT&CK/CAPEC/CWE, and runs guided compliance workflows (threat modeling, DPIA, gap analysis) from your own MCP client — Claude, Copilot, ChatGPT, or any MCP-capable agent. If a source is unavailable it says so rather than answering from model memory. Auth is OAuth 2.1 with Dynamic Client Registration; a free tier is available for business users at ansvar.eu.

Läpileikkaava perusta suomalaiseen juridiseen työhön: lakikieli, pykäläviittaukset, suomen kieli, oikeustutkimus (Finlex/oik.ai) ja juridisen asiakirjan tarkistus.

BGE/ATF/DTF precedent research, case strategy, legal drafting, and citation verification across all 26 Swiss cantons with Anwaltsgeheimnis privacy protection.

CoCounsel Legal delivers comprehensive Westlaw Deep Research reports with inline, linked citations to Westlaw and Practical Law sources.

Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.

A jurisdiction-grounding reference file for AI assistants working on Gibraltar legal, regulatory, and compliance research. Corrects systematic errors AI models make when applying English law to Gibraltar — a distinct jurisdiction under the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006, with its own court hierarchy, civil procedure rules, employment law, and regulatory framework. Covers the source hierarchy, court structure, civil procedure divergences (14-day deemed service, post-Jackson reforms not adopted), employment law specifics (uncapped discrimination awards, 5-employee redundancy threshold), FSC financial services regulation, AML/KYC compliance sources, Gibraltar Companies Act 2014 with UBO public register, and a structured directory of official public record sources. Includes research profiles for lawyers, compliance professionals, and due diligence practitioners. Not legal advice.

Ce skill donne accès à l'API de judilibre. Vous formulez votre demande en français, il interroge la base Judlibre et renvoie les réponses. Attention le skill ne fonctionne que si des domaines supplémentaires sont utilisés et que l'utilisateur a rentré sa propre clé Judlibre. Ce skill et son auteur n'ont aucun lien avec la Cour de cassation ou Judilibre.

EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.

Asistente jurídico experto en derecho chileno. Úsalo cuando el usuario haga consultas sobre normativa, códigos, procedimientos o jurisprudencia de Chile y necesite respuestas fundamentadas con cita de ley y artículo y una fuente verificable (BCN). No usar para derecho de otros países ni como reemplazo de asesoría legal formal. Funciona SIN base de datos externa: responde con el conocimiento del modelo, por lo que debe marcar toda incertidumbre y remitir a la fuente oficial para verificación.

Post-hoc verification and trust audit of AI-generated factual and interpretive claims. Classifies claims by type and salience, routes them to domain-appropriate sources, scores trustworthiness on a tiered scale with an Interpolated verdict for plausible-but-unsupported detail, and assesses rhetorical fairness on interpretive claims. Designed with a focus on healthcare law in England and Wales, but with general applicability beyond.

Swiss legal source and authority triage. Use when a user asks a Swiss legal, regulatory, compliance, contract, employment, corporate, litigation, IP, tax, privacy, public-law, fintech, register, or cantonal-law question; when Swiss law may apply; or when an AI legal answer needs source routing across federal, cantonal, communal, regulator, register, contractual, professional, soft-law, multilingual, or open-data layers.

Recherche, cartographie et analyse des thèses de doctorat françaises via theses.fr (API ABES) et TEL (HAL). Spécialisée droit avec filtrage par sous-disciplines juridiques. Ouverte sur d'autres domaines universitaires. Capacités : (1) recherche multi-critères — sujet, directeur, jury, établissement, école doctorale, période, statut soutenue/en préparation, discipline ; (2) cartographie académique — qui dirige sur quel sujet, qui siège dans quels jurys, réseaux de co-direction, écoles doctorales productives ; (3) analyses temporelles — évolution d'un sujet, détection de saturation, calendrier des soutenances à venir ; (4) filtrage sous-discipline juridique — droit privé, public, social, affaires, international, etc. Déclencher dès que l'utilisateur mentionne thèse, doctorat, directeur de thèse, jury de thèse, école doctorale, soutenance, doctorant, ou demande une analyse d'écosystème doctoral. Pour articles ou ouvrages de doctrine, utiliser plutôt recherche-doctrine.

This Skill creates a research brief for an area of US employment law. The brief can address a specific question or be a multi-state survey. It'll include citations to primary sources (e.g. statutes, rule, government guidance), and reputable secondary sources like client alerts and multi-state surveys from top law firms and articles from legal publications (e.g. National Law Review).

Ricerca rapida della giurisprudenza italiana, finalizzata a fornire un primo quadro orientativo su una determinata questione giuridica. Consulta le pronunce della Corte di cassazione, dei TAR e del Consiglio di Stato, nonché le banche dati giuridiche italiane (DeJure, Italgiure), per individuare le decisioni pertinenti; sintetizza l’orientamento giurisprudenziale prevalente, segnala eventuali pronunce contrastanti ed evidenzia le implicazioni operative ai fini della formulazione di pareri o della definizione della strategia. Il risultato è una nota strutturata di primo orientamento, non un’analisi esaustiva.

MCP server for German federal laws, EU regulations/directives, and German federal court decisions — hybrid semantic + BM25 search across the full corpus, with verified citation lookup, table-of-contents navigation, and norm-to-case-law tracing. Lawbster makes German and EU primary law machine-readable for AI assistants via the Model Context Protocol. The server indexes the full body of German federal law (Gesetze-im-Internet — thousands of statutes and regulations), EU regulations and directives (EUR-Lex), and the full case-law of all German federal supreme courts and the EU courts. Lawbster isn’t just another AI tool built in isolation. The underlying logic, the compliance checks, and the regulatory frameworks it draws on were shaped with input from experienced lawyers at Planit // LEGAL a leading IT and data protection law boutique — practitioners who work with these regulations day to day, not just in theory. Search uses a three-stage hybrid pipeline (dense vector + BM25 sparse → RRF fusion → cross-encoder reranking), so colloquial questions resolve against statutory language. Citations like § 823 BGB, Art. 6 DSGVO, or C-311/18 resolve to verified full text — never hallucinated. The norm → Rechtsprechung chain surfaces the controlling case-law line behind a statute, which is often more decisive than the bare statute text. The current launch corpus covers German federal law and EU law. Additional jurisdictions and source types are on the roadmap — UK law (UK Public General Acts, UKSC/EWCA case-law) is the next planned expansion, followed by further European jurisdictions (e.g. AT, CH, FR, NL). The MCP tool surface stays stable; new jurisdictions are added via the existing jurisdiction filter and source_type enum, so existing client integrations keep working.

Serveur MCP local en stdio connectant les assistants IA à l’API Judilibre pour rechercher, récupérer et analyser les décisions de justice françaises de la Cour de cassation et des cours d’appel.