Explore

A jurisdiction-grounding reference file for AI assistants working on Gibraltar legal, regulatory, and compliance research. Corrects systematic errors AI models make when applying English law to Gibraltar — a distinct jurisdiction under the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006, with its own court hierarchy, civil procedure rules, employment law, and regulatory framework. Covers the source hierarchy, court structure, civil procedure divergences (14-day deemed service, post-Jackson reforms not adopted), employment law specifics (uncapped discrimination awards, 5-employee redundancy threshold), FSC financial services regulation, AML/KYC compliance sources, Gibraltar Companies Act 2014 with UBO public register, and a structured directory of official public record sources. Includes research profiles for lawyers, compliance professionals, and due diligence practitioners. Not legal advice.

Ce skill donne accès à l'API de judilibre. Vous formulez votre demande en français, il interroge la base Judlibre et renvoie les réponses. Attention le skill ne fonctionne que si des domaines supplémentaires sont utilisés et que l'utilisateur a rentré sa propre clé Judlibre. Ce skill et son auteur n'ont aucun lien avec la Cour de cassation ou Judilibre.

EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.

Jurisdiction-locked legal research assistant for Chilean law. Answers natural-language questions about Chilean codes, statutes, procedures, and case law, and must back every legal statement with the law name, the exact article, and a verifiable source link to the Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional (BCN). It refuses questions about other jurisdictions and flags uncertainty rather than inventing article numbers, statutes, or case (ROL) numbers. Note: it has no live statute database — it answers from the model's own knowledge and directs the user to confirm each citation at the official source — and its output is reference material, not formal legal advice.

Post-hoc verification and trust audit of AI-generated factual and interpretive claims. Classifies claims by type and salience, routes them to domain-appropriate sources, scores trustworthiness on a tiered scale with an Interpolated verdict for plausible-but-unsupported detail, and assesses rhetorical fairness on interpretive claims. Designed with a focus on healthcare law in England and Wales, but with general applicability beyond.

Swiss legal source and authority triage. Use when a user asks a Swiss legal, regulatory, compliance, contract, employment, corporate, litigation, IP, tax, privacy, public-law, fintech, register, or cantonal-law question; when Swiss law may apply; or when an AI legal answer needs source routing across federal, cantonal, communal, regulator, register, contractual, professional, soft-law, multilingual, or open-data layers.

Research, mapping, and analysis of French doctoral theses via theses.fr (ABES API) and TEL (HAL). Specialized in law, with filtering by legal subdiscipline. Also open to other academic fields. Capabilities: (1) multi-criteria search — topic, supervisor, examination committee, institution, doctoral school, period, defended/in-progress status, discipline; (2) academic mapping — who supervises which topics, who sits on which committees, co-supervision networks, productive doctoral schools; (3) temporal analysis — evolution of a topic, detection of saturation, upcoming defense schedule; (4) legal subdiscipline filtering — private law, public law, labor law, business law, international law, etc. Trigger whenever the user mentions thesis, doctorate, thesis supervisor, thesis committee, doctoral school, defense, doctoral candidate, or requests an analysis of a doctoral ecosystem. For legal scholarship articles or books, use `recherche-doctrine` instead.

This Skill creates a research brief for an area of US employment law. The brief can address a specific question or be a multi-state survey. It'll include citations to primary sources (e.g. statutes, rule, government guidance), and reputable secondary sources like client alerts and multi-state surveys from top law firms and articles from legal publications (e.g. National Law Review).

Rapid Italian case law research producing an initial orientation framework on a given legal topic. Searches the Corte di Cassazione, TAR, Consiglio di Stato, and Italian legal databases (DeJure, Italgiure) for relevant rulings, summarizes the prevailing jurisprudential orientation, flags conflicting decisions, and surfaces operational implications for opinions or strategy. Output is a structured starting-point brief, not an exhaustive analysis.

MCP server for German federal laws, EU regulations/directives, and German federal court decisions — hybrid semantic + BM25 search across the full corpus, with verified citation lookup, table-of-contents navigation, and norm-to-case-law tracing. Lawbster makes German and EU primary law machine-readable for AI assistants via the Model Context Protocol. The server indexes the full body of German federal law (Gesetze-im-Internet — thousands of statutes and regulations), EU regulations and directives (EUR-Lex), and the full case-law of all German federal supreme courts and the EU courts. Lawbster isn’t just another AI tool built in isolation. The underlying logic, the compliance checks, and the regulatory frameworks it draws on were shaped with input from experienced lawyers at Planit // LEGAL a leading IT and data protection law boutique — practitioners who work with these regulations day to day, not just in theory. Search uses a three-stage hybrid pipeline (dense vector + BM25 sparse → RRF fusion → cross-encoder reranking), so colloquial questions resolve against statutory language. Citations like § 823 BGB, Art. 6 DSGVO, or C-311/18 resolve to verified full text — never hallucinated. The norm → Rechtsprechung chain surfaces the controlling case-law line behind a statute, which is often more decisive than the bare statute text. The current launch corpus covers German federal law and EU law. Additional jurisdictions and source types are on the roadmap — UK law (UK Public General Acts, UKSC/EWCA case-law) is the next planned expansion, followed by further European jurisdictions (e.g. AT, CH, FR, NL). The MCP tool surface stays stable; new jurisdictions are added via the existing jurisdiction filter and source_type enum, so existing client integrations keep working.

Local stdio MCP server that connects AI assistants to the Judilibre API for searching, retrieving, and analyzing French court decisions from the Cour de cassation and courts of appeal.

Models the legal reasoning of a French judge when analyzing civil cases. Use this skill to analyze a dispute and identify legal issues, construct a structured legal argument (syllogism), draft the reasoning for a civil judgment, search for applicable case law and statutes via Judilibre and Légifrance, legally characterize facts and acts, and distinguish between claims, grounds, and arguments. Based on the Methodological Guides for Drafting Civil Judgments (ENM/Court of Cassation, 2023).

Local stdio MCP server that connects AI assistants to the Légifrance API for searching French codes, legislation, decrees, Journal Officiel publications, and retrieving legal articles.

Access EU law. Search and retrieve Directives, Regulations, Treaties and CJEU case law from GoodLegal API and EUR-Lex.

Use this skill when asked to find, cite, analyze, or summarize Icelandic court decisions. Triggers on requests involving Hæstiréttur (Supreme Court), Landsréttur (Court of Appeal), Félagsdómur (Labour Court), héraðsdómur (District Court) case law, or Icelandic legal precedent research.

Use this skill when asked to translate, explain, or map Icelandic legal terms to English (or vice versa). Triggers on requests involving Icelandic legal vocabulary, legal translation, understanding Icelandic statutes or court decisions, or cross-referencing Icelandic and common law concepts.

Moonlit is a Dutch legaltech company with a mission to make global legal information accessible and structured. A team of data engineers and legal engineers aggregates legal data from official government sources worldwide and transforms it into structured, continuously updated legal intelligence. Trusted by ~6,000 users including judges, lawyers, and researchers. ISO 27001 certified, EU-hosted. Moonlit provides global legal data infrastructure for AI workflows. The platform covers 190+ jurisdictions with 150+ official legal sources, updated daily. It supports keyword, semantic, and hybrid search with reranking across 11M+ legal documents — case law, legislation, and regulatory texts. Use Moonlit for cross-border legal research spanning multiple EU and national jurisdictions. It is well-suited for regulatory monitoring, multi-jurisdictional due diligence, and building multilingual legal retrieval pipelines. Jurisdictions: EU (28+ jurisdictions), UK, France, Germany, Benelux, Switzerland, UN

GoodLegal is an AI-powered legal research API built by Zacharie Laik, focused on French and EU law. Where Legal Data Hunter indexes global sources, GoodLegal provides a developer-ready API with sub-second response times for French court decisions, legal codes, and EU texts. OAuth and API key authentication.

Legal Data Hunter is a community-driven initiative with the goal of indexing every source of law on the planet into a single searchable layer. Built on the philosophy that the law belongs to everyone, the platform crawls official government sources and adds new ones approximately every 30 minutes. Contributors can suggest sources, vote on priorities, and apply as Jurisdiction Leads. Legal Data Hunter gives your AI assistant access to 18.6M+ legal documents across 108 countries and 533 official government sources. It covers 13.4M+ court decisions, 4.6M+ laws and regulations, and 637K+ doctrine texts. The MCP server supports hybrid semantic + keyword retrieval with country, source, and court-level filtering — the broadest multi-jurisdictional legal coverage available via MCP. Use Legal Data Hunter for large-scale multi-jurisdictional legal search, legal citation resolution, or comparative law research. It excels at due diligence workflows and building legal knowledge pipelines that need the broadest possible country coverage. Jurisdictions: 108 countries (13.4M+ decisions, 4.6M+ laws, 637K+ doctrine texts)

data.gouv.fr is the French government official open data platform, operated by the DINUM (Direction interministerielle du numerique). This MCP server is maintained by the data.gouv.fr team itself — a first-party integration giving AI agents direct read-only access to France national open data catalog. MIT-licensed, actively maintained, no authentication required. Official MCP server for [data.gouv.fr](https://www.data.gouv.fr), the French government open data platform. Exposes **9 tools** across three categories: - **Dataset tools** (5): search datasets, get metadata, list resources, query tabular data in-place - **Dataservice tools** (3): discover APIs, retrieve OpenAPI specs - **Metrics tools** (1): track visits and downloads Covers 74K+ datasets, 387K+ resources, and 6K+ organizations. 1,124 GitHub stars, MIT license. Use DataGouv when you need to explore or analyze French public datasets — statistics, government reports, regulatory data, or open data catalogs. Particularly useful for legal and regulatory analysis that requires official public data sources. Jurisdictions: France (government open data)

OpenLegi is built by Le Lab at dassignies.law, a French law firm. It wraps the official PISTE Legifrance API — the French government legal data gateway — into an MCP server, giving AI assistants direct access to authoritative French and EU legal sources. Free tier available with shared rate limits; bring your own PISTE credentials for unlimited access. OpenLegi is an MCP server for official French legal sources, built on the Legifrance PISTE API. It exposes **30+ tools** across three service endpoints: - **Legifrance** (12 tools): search codes, jurisprudence, CNIL decisions, JORF, conventions collectives - **RNE/INPI** (9 tools): company search, BODACC, KBIS extracts, financial statements - **EUR-Lex** (9 tools): EU law search, article retrieval, metadata Covers 73 legal codes, 1.2M+ court decisions, and 14 active databases. Use OpenLegi when you need access to authoritative French legal sources — official codes, consolidated legislation, published case law, CNIL decisions, or collective agreements. Use the RNE service for company due diligence and the EUR-Lex service for EU law research. Jurisdictions: France (Legifrance, CETAT, CONSTIT, CNIL, KALI, JORF, BOFiP, BODACC), European Union (EUR-Lex, subscription)

Multi-jurisdictional legal research and risk assessment using the Legal Data Hunter MCP (40+ countries, 13M+ documents). Use when the user asks about law across multiple countries, comparative law, cross-border regulatory analysis, or case law/legislation in any European or other covered jurisdiction. Triggers on jurisdictional comparison, cross-border risk, multi-country compliance, GDPR enforcement across member states, or Legal Data Hunter references. Also handles single non-French jurisdiction research. For French-only law, prefer goodlegal-research.

Expert legal research and drafting assistant covering French law, European law (EU and ECHR), and foreign law via LegalDataHunter, for legal professionals and researchers. Covers ten tasks: scoping, legal research, consultation, drafting of legal instruments, document analysis, counter-argumentation, contract analysis, legal monitoring, reference verification, and bibliographic harmonization. Strict anti-hallucination rule (Search → Find → Cite) with temporal verification of every normative text via OpenLegi. Use this skill whenever the user mentions French or European law, asks for legal research, a consultation, drafting of a legal instrument, contract or document analysis, citation verification via OpenLegi/HAL/ECHR, or is preparing case files — even when they don't explicitly say "legal assistant".

Install and set up the Legal Data Hunter MCP server. Use when the user wants to connect their AI agent to legal data, install legal-data-hunter, add a legal search MCP, or search legal documents across jurisdictions.