Explorar

Audit Terms of Service, user agreements, and privacy policies for consumer risks, producing a structured report that flags unfair clauses, data traps, and liability issues. Trigger when a user asks to review, audit, or analyze a ToS, privacy policy, or user agreement, or mentions specific concerns like auto-renewal or data authorization.

Recherche de fiches individuelles dans l'annuaire "Enseignants-chercheurs" du Portail Universitaire du Droit (univ-droit.fr/universitaires). Utiliser ce skill dès que l'utilisateur demande de chercher, vérifier ou retrouver un enseignant-chercheur — professeur, professeur junior, maître de conférences, PRAG, directeur/chargé de recherche, professeur associé — sur univ-droit.fr, que ce soit pour trouver sa fonction, son université de rattachement, sa bibliographie, son laboratoire, ou pour vérifier l'orthographe d'un nom, même si l'URL exacte de la fiche n'est pas connue à l'avance.

Recherche de fiches individuelles dans l'annuaire "Docteurs en droit" du Portail Universitaire du Droit (univ-droit.fr/annuaire-des-docteurs-en-droit). Utiliser ce skill dès que l'utilisateur demande de chercher, vérifier ou retrouver un docteur en droit (titulaire d'un doctorat, non enseignant-chercheur en poste) sur univ-droit.fr, que ce soit pour trouver le sujet et la date de sa thèse, son directeur de thèse, son établissement, sa bibliographie, ou pour vérifier l'orthographe d'un nom, même si l'URL exacte de la fiche n'est pas connue à l'avance.

Recherche et vérification de revues et encyclopédies juridiques francophones via le site public meta-doctrinal.org (Annuaire des revues, 300+ titres ; Annuaire des encyclopédies, ~280 titres — JurisClasseurs, Répertoires, Lamy, Mémentos, etc.). Utiliser ce skill dès qu'un utilisateur demande si une revue ou encyclopédie juridique existe, veut retrouver sa fiche, cherche sa direction scientifique, ses auteurs, son éditeur, ses consignes éditoriales, ou veut comparer/lister des titres par éditeur (Dalloz, LexisNexis, Lamy Liaisons, Éditions Législatives, Lextenso, Lexbase, Éditions Francis Lefebvre, Berger-Levrault). Toujours consulter ce skill avant de répondre de mémoire à ce type de question — meta-doctrinal.org est la source de référence à interroger en direct, même si le titre semble connu.

Search The Chancery Lane Project's knowledge graph of climate-related contract clauses, glossary terms, and guides. Use `search` for relevance-ranked results across all content. Use `entity_lookup` when you have a specific concept or entity name (e.g. 'scope 3 emissions') and want to find the clauses and terms that mention it. To browse content by taxonomy categories (sector, practice area, application, jurisdiction, etc.) rather than by relevance, call `taxonomy_facets` first to discover the available facet names and value slugs, then call `taxonomy_content` with the slugs you want.

Assistant juridique français en droit des étrangers et de l'asile, articulé avec le droit social, le droit du travail, les accords bilatéraux et le droit UE. Treize skills (jurisprudence, contentieux du séjour/OQTF, admission exceptionnelle, autorisation de travail, visas/RAPO, accords bilatéraux, droit UE, handicap, anonymisation, Word) et quatre sous-agents pour les tâches volumineuses. Méthode chercher-trouver-lire-vérifier-citer : aucune référence non vérifiée dans la session.

Arbitrator research tool for investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), built for arbitration counsel. It produces reliable, structured, and thorough insights into arbitrators' experience, and can identify, evaluate, and rank the suitability of arbitrators for specific disputes. The tool flags arbitrator decisions and publications that bear on the issues in the dispute, checks an arbitrator's caseload, and suggests additional issues for counsel's consideration prior to nomination. Try asking about specific arbitrators, or describe your dispute and ask for a shortlist of suitable arbitrator candidates. Outputs are grounded in the UNCTAD ISDS Navigator dataset, targeted live lookups (ICSID), and additional verification from primary sources. For best functionality, also download the isds-research skill.

Condense a scholarly legal article by moving nonessential detail from the body into substantive footnotes while preserving every word and keeping the argument self-sufficient. Handles Markdown and Word (.docx), integrates moved material with existing notes, measures a user-specified relegation fraction (25% by default), and delivers a move-by-move memo. Use when asked to "push detail into footnotes," "relegate to footnotes," "footnote the caveats," "move the digressions down," or tighten a dense draft without deleting content. Word output requires file access plus document-conversion and rendering support; when those capabilities are unavailable, deliver Markdown and the memo or ask for a convertible source.

Outil pour juristes : recherche jurisprudentielle et normative fiable, rigueur de citation totale. Spécialisé en droit des étrangers/asile, avec articulations vers droit du travail, droit social et droit européen de la matière, et capacité de comparaison entre pays — mais entièrement capable, même rigueur, sur toute autre branche du droit français/européen (civil, commercial, administratif, pénal...) : la spécialisation enrichit, elle ne limite pas. Couvre jurisprudence (Cass., CE, CAA, TA, CNDA, Cons. constit., CNIL, CEDH, CJUE), normes (codes français à toute date, droit UE, traités, accords bilatéraux, 59 droits étrangers, BOFiP, conventions collectives), fiche d'arrêt, analyse approfondie, comparaison, analyse contradictoire sur demande. Pour la pleine capacité, installer les MCP associés (LibreJustice, OpenLegi, Moonlit) — voir Prérequis. Actif sur \"résume cet arrêt\", \"que dit l'article X\", \"compare ces arrêts\", \"analyse contradictoire\", et toute question de droit.

Expertise complète en droit français des étrangers, de l'asile et de la nationalité — entrée et visas, séjour (CESEDA livre IV, AES, étranger malade, regroupement familial, métiers en tension), éloignement et contentieux (OQTF, IRTF, rétention, référés, TA/CAA/CE), asile (OFPRA, CNDA, Dublin, CMA/ADA), nationalité et droits sociaux des étrangers (AME, PUMa, RSA, AAH, ASPA). Interroge en priorité trois connecteurs MCP complémentaires — OpenLegi (textes, jurisprudence administrative), LibreJustice (recherche sémantique tous ordres) et Legal Data Hunter (rétention/JLD, graphe de citations, statut de validité) — puis les sources officielles (Légifrance, ANEF, OFPRA, CNDA) et la doctrine associative (GISTI, Cimade, ADDE, Comede, Anafé). Déclencher dès qu'une question porte sur un étranger en France, même sans vocabulaire juridique — « papier de la préfecture », « récépissé périmé », « la CAF refuse le RSA » — et pour toute consultation, recours, note ou vérification de références dans ces matières.

Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.

Create original, competition-ready commercial mediation problems and confidential packets with iterative validation. Use when a user provides a topic, industry, dispute sketch, or existing general-information packet and wants a public packet plus confidential packets for both sides—or one named side. Build a narrow but workable settlement corridor; verify factual and numerical consistency, information asymmetry, balance, originality, and commercial feasibility; and revise until deterministic and semantic exit criteria pass. Do not use merely to summarize an existing packet or to advise parties in a real dispute. Requires local file access; Python 3 is recommended for bundled deterministic checks, with disclosed manual fallbacks when unavailable.

Creates and validates original commercial mediation competition problems for legal education and advocacy training. Use the generator to turn a topic or dispute sketch into general information, confidential packets for both sides, an author-only case model, and validation records. Use the validator to audit completed packets for internal consistency, balanced information asymmetry, credible settlement options, numerical coherence, confidentiality boundaries, and competition readiness. The two skills may be used sequentially or independently. Designed for fictional training problems, not legal advice or real client matters.

Professional PDF solution. Create PDFs using HTML+Paged.js (academic papers, reports, documents). Process existing PDFs using Python (read, extract, merge, split, fill forms). Supports KaTeX math formulas, Mermaid diagrams, three-line tables, citations, and other academic elements. Also use this skill when user explicitly requests LaTeX (.tex) or native LaTeX compilation.

Builds compliance checklists for business scenarios involving GDPR, PIPL, or advertising/data laws. Outputs a structured checklist with check items, legal basis, risk levels, and actionable recommendations. Triggered by requests like \"run a compliance check,\" \"GDPR/PIPL compliance,\" \"pre-launch review,\" \"privacy impact assessment (PIA/DPIA),\" or asking if a feature is compliant.

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

Gratuit et open source, LibreJustice est le seul connecteur dont vous aurez besoin pour le droit français : ~3,7 millions de décisions des deux ordres et ~3,6 millions d'articles de loi dans la même base, reliés article par article. Jurisprudence administrative et judiciaire, Conseil constitutionnel, CEDH, CJUE et CNDA. Les textes se lisent tels qu'en vigueur à n'importe quelle date, avec l'historique de leurs versions : codes et lois, Journal officiel, conventions collectives, circulaires, BOFiP, droit de l'UE, traités, codes étrangers de 59 pays. Le graphe des citations se remonte dans les deux sens : d'une décision vers les articles qu'elle cite, d'un article vers les décisions qui l'appliquent. Recherche en langage naturel, hybride lexicale et sémantique. Connexion OAuth sans clé à coller, corpus mis à jour quotidiennement.

Assistant de recherche juridique (librejustice.fr) : serveur MCP distant avec OAuth automatique + skills — jurisprudence et normes (codes, traités, UE, droit étranger).

Find and quote statutory and regulatory law with the LibreJustice MCP tools — French codes at any date, EU law, treaties and bilateral accords, foreign codes (59 countries), collective agreements, BOFiP, circulaires. Use whenever the user asks what a text says or said at a given date, which version or which text applies to a situation, needs the exact wording of a provision for a brief, or works with foreign or international law in French litigation, even if they never mention LibreJustice.

Search and cite French case law and statutes with the LibreJustice MCP tools. Use whenever the user asks about French or European court decisions (Cour de cassation, Conseil d'État, cours d'appel, TJ/TA, CNDA, Conseil constitutionnel, CNIL, CEDH, CJUE), needs authorities for a brief, requête, référé or consultation, wants to check how courts rule on an issue, needs counts of decisions on a point, or asks what a code article says at a given date, even if they never mention LibreJustice.

Checks the formal coherence and plausibility of Italian and EU legal citations (statutes, case law) in text produced by Claude or other legal-AI skills. Reports clause-by-clause on what is well-formed, suspicious, or unresolvable against real norms, covering Cassazione, Corte Costituzionale, Consiglio di Stato, TAR, Normattiva, EUR-Lex, Garante Privacy, AGCM, ANAC. Minimal-surface variant: no proprietary backend fetch, allowlist limited to official Italian and EU institutional registries.

Guide for end-to-end California Bar Exam prep — the five essays (13 subjects), the 90-minute Performance Test, and the 200-question MBE (7 subjects). Built by a practicing attorney who used it to compress four months of prep into a week and a half.

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

Rigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers and other legal scholarship. Runs six specialized passes — structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar and clarity, fact-checking against sources, and a synthesizing memo — and delivers an editorial memo with issues prioritized as critical, substantial or minor and keyed to specific footnotes and paragraphs. Handles articles of any length, including 50,000-word pieces, by chunking on section boundaries. Reads .docx directly. Use when editing, critiquing, workshopping or pre-submission-reviewing academic legal writing. Triggers on "edit my article," "review this draft," "critique my note," "check my Bluebook citations," "is my argument sound," "read my law review piece," "workshop this paper," "pre-submission review." Chunking needs Python 3; fact-checking needs web search; both degrade gracefully without.