Explore

Verification-first methodology for the post-WWII tribunals: the IMT at Nuremberg, the twelve Nuremberg Military Tribunals, and the IMTFE at Tokyo. Citations are verified against the official records (Blue/Green Series, Pritchard-Zaide) and the digital archives (Avalon, Harvard NTP, UVA IMTFE). Guards the four classic traps (IMT vs NMT; Nuremberg vs Tokyo; Charter article numbers; majority judgment vs separate opinions, e.g. the Pal dissent). Research aid, not legal advice.

MCP server for German federal laws, EU regulations/directives, and German federal court decisions — hybrid semantic + BM25 search across the full corpus, with verified citation lookup, table-of-contents navigation, and norm-to-case-law tracing. Lawbster makes German and EU primary law machine-readable for AI assistants via the Model Context Protocol. The server indexes the full body of German federal law (Gesetze-im-Internet — thousands of statutes and regulations), EU regulations and directives (EUR-Lex), and the full case-law of all German federal supreme courts and the EU courts. Lawbster isn’t just another AI tool built in isolation. The underlying logic, the compliance checks, and the regulatory frameworks it draws on were shaped with input from experienced lawyers at Planit // LEGAL a leading IT and data protection law boutique — practitioners who work with these regulations day to day, not just in theory. Search uses a three-stage hybrid pipeline (dense vector + BM25 sparse → RRF fusion → cross-encoder reranking), so colloquial questions resolve against statutory language. Citations like § 823 BGB, Art. 6 DSGVO, or C-311/18 resolve to verified full text — never hallucinated. The norm → Rechtsprechung chain surfaces the controlling case-law line behind a statute, which is often more decisive than the bare statute text. The current launch corpus covers German federal law and EU law. Additional jurisdictions and source types are on the roadmap — UK law (UK Public General Acts, UKSC/EWCA case-law) is the next planned expansion, followed by further European jurisdictions (e.g. AT, CH, FR, NL). The MCP tool surface stays stable; new jurisdictions are added via the existing jurisdiction filter and source_type enum, so existing client integrations keep working.

Used daily at the Dutch Supreme Court, government and Big Four firms: Moonlit connects your AI assistant to a citation graph of official law, updated daily. Ask a legal question, get an answer built from the official publication, every citation checkable at the source in one click. The Data Layer: 19M+ documents from 130+ official portals and 3,900+ courts, legislatures and regulators across 30+ jurisdictions, 100M+ citation references, plus 100 law firm publications. Pull every judgment interpreting GDPR Article 22. Compare non-compete rules across three countries in one prompt. Trace the VAT Directive into national law and tax guidance. First-party skills teach the assistant to research and cite like a careful lawyer. Free tier: 100 calls a month, no card. Connect at mcp.moonlit.ai/mcp; setup for every MCP client at moonlit.ai/docs/mcp/connect. Europe first, global expansion underway. ISO 27001 certified, EU-hosted, GDPR compliant. 7,000+ users at courts, ministries, universities and in-house teams.

Conducts a structured Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) under Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the full EDPB three-step test — interest identification, strict necessity analysis, and the balancing test with mitigation. Built on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), CNIL guidance (June 2025), ICO/DUA Act 2025, key CJEU judgments, and DPA positions from DE/FR/NL/AT/IT/ES/UK. Includes specialised modules for AI/ML, marketing, fraud prevention, children's data, employee monitoring, ePrivacy overlap, and cross-border, plus a dedicated Right to Object (Art. 21) response mode and structured LIA output. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR Art. 6(1)(f), legitimate interest, the LIA or three-step test, EDPB/DPA guidance, AI training data lawfulness, web scraping legality, direct marketing or fraud prevention legal basis, employee monitoring, the right to object, or asks for a balancing test — even if they don't say "LIA" explicitly.

Structured NIS2 compliance assessment covering scope classification (Annex I/II, size thresholds, DORA/CIR checks), gap analysis across all 10 Art. 21 risk management measures with 0–4 maturity scoring and ISO 27001 references, and a prioritized compliance roadmap. Deep German BSIG-neu coverage (BSI registration, § 30/32/38, incident reporting, Nachweispflicht) plus high-level jurisdiction profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, and Spain. Built on ENISA guidance and BSI #nis2know packages.