Explore

Verification-first methodology for the post-WWII tribunals: the IMT at Nuremberg, the twelve Nuremberg Military Tribunals, and the IMTFE at Tokyo. Citations are verified against the official records (Blue/Green Series, Pritchard-Zaide) and the digital archives (Avalon, Harvard NTP, UVA IMTFE). Guards the four classic traps (IMT vs NMT; Nuremberg vs Tokyo; Charter article numbers; majority judgment vs separate opinions, e.g. the Pal dissent). Research aid, not legal advice.

Multi-jurisdictional legal research and risk assessment using the Legal Data Hunter MCP (40+ countries, 13M+ documents). Use when the user asks about law across multiple countries, comparative law, cross-border regulatory analysis, or case law/legislation in any European or other covered jurisdiction. Triggers on jurisdictional comparison, cross-border risk, multi-country compliance, GDPR enforcement across member states, or Legal Data Hunter references. Also handles single non-French jurisdiction research. For French-only law, prefer goodlegal-research.

Conducts a structured Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) under Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the full EDPB three-step test — interest identification, strict necessity analysis, and the balancing test with mitigation. Built on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), CNIL guidance (June 2025), ICO/DUA Act 2025, key CJEU judgments, and DPA positions from DE/FR/NL/AT/IT/ES/UK. Includes specialised modules for AI/ML, marketing, fraud prevention, children's data, employee monitoring, ePrivacy overlap, and cross-border, plus a dedicated Right to Object (Art. 21) response mode and structured LIA output. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR Art. 6(1)(f), legitimate interest, the LIA or three-step test, EDPB/DPA guidance, AI training data lawfulness, web scraping legality, direct marketing or fraud prevention legal basis, employee monitoring, the right to object, or asks for a balancing test — even if they don't say "LIA" explicitly.

Structured NIS2 compliance assessment covering scope classification (Annex I/II, size thresholds, DORA/CIR checks), gap analysis across all 10 Art. 21 risk management measures with 0–4 maturity scoring and ISO 27001 references, and a prioritized compliance roadmap. Deep German BSIG-neu coverage (BSI registration, § 30/32/38, incident reporting, Nachweispflicht) plus high-level jurisdiction profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, and Spain. Built on ENISA guidance and BSI #nis2know packages.