Authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents, including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification. Answers any EU AI Act question with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, and sector-specific guidance — covering penalties, timelines, GPAI obligations, high-risk and prohibited practices, and the AI Act / GDPR interplay.
EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — Deployment Guide
> 📄 View the interactive skill page →
See CHANGELOG.md for version history.
Overview
EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — an authoritative regulatory Q&A skill grounded in 70 official EU source documents:
- Article-level citations from the full text of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
- Full preamble + 13 Titles covered by structured reference files (Titles I–XIII)
- Commission guidelines on AI system definition, prohibited practices, high-risk classification, and Digital Omnibus
- EDPB/EDPS opinions including Opinion 28/2024 (AI-DPIA interplay) and 2026 joint opinion
- Codes of Practice — GPAI Code (3 versions), Transparency Code (drafts + overview)
- FRIA materials — Art. 27 text, Danish Institute guide, ECNL practical guide
- Harmonised standards — Art. 40 framework, prEN 18286, JTC 21 roadmap
- Sector-specific guidance for banking, medical devices, staffing, healthcare, law enforcement
- National implementation tracking — German AI bill, regulatory sandboxes, national service desks
- Incident reporting templates — GPAI serious incident, Art. 73 high-risk draft guidance
File Structure
ai-act-knowledge/
├── SKILL.md # Main skill instructions (deploy this)
├── CHANGELOG.md # Version history
└── references/ # 70 reference files across 15 subdirectories
├── core/ # Regulation text by Title (I–XIII) + preamble + Annex III + decision trees
├── guidelines/ # Commission guidelines (AI system definition, prohibited, GPAI, omnibus)
├── codes-of-practice/ # GPAI Code + Transparency Code (multiple versions)
├── opinions/ # EDPB/EDPS opinions (2021, 2026, 28/2024)
├── standards/ # Art. 40 harmonised standards, prEN 18286, JTC 21
├── fria/ # Art. 27 FRIA — text + practical guides
├── governance/ # AI Office FAQ, AI Pact, enforcement, timeline
├── national/ # National implementation (DE bill, sandboxes, service desks)
├── sector-specific/ # Banking, medical devices, staffing
├── cybersecurity/ # ENISA advisories
├── law-enforcement/ # Europol AI policing
├── compliance-guides/ # AI literacy, SME guide, copyright/TDM, whistleblowing
├── impact-assessments/ # Commission IA + supporting study + healthcare 2026
└── templates/ # GPAI training data, serious incident, high-risk draft
Deployment
Claude.ai (User Skills)
- Go to Settings → Profile → Custom Skills (or equivalent)
- Upload the entire
ai-act-knowledge/folder structure - The skill will auto-trigger when you ask about AI Act articles, requirements, penalties, GPAI obligations, FRIA, or any AI Act topic
Claude Code / Custom MCP Setup
- Copy the
ai-act-knowledge/folder to your skills directory:cp -r ai-act-knowledge/ /path/to/your/skills/user/ai-act-knowledge/ - Ensure the skill is registered in your configuration
Usage
Quick Start
Ask any AI Act question:
> "What does Art. 27 require for a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment, and
> when does it apply to deployers of high-risk systems?"
The skill will route to the right reference files and produce a cited answer.
Trigger Phrases
- "Explain Art. X" / "What does Article X say?" / "AI Act requirements"
- "GPAI obligations" / "High-risk AI" / "Prohibited AI practices"
- "AI Act and GDPR" / "Fundamental rights impact assessment" / "AI literacy"
- "KI-Verordnung" / "Hochrisiko-KI" / "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"
> For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision (rather than a
> knowledge answer), ask for a structured risk-tier classification.
Workflow
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Classify Question | Topic Router determines which reference subdirectory(ies) to consult |
| 2. Load References | Read targeted reference files (article text, guidelines, opinions, codes) |
| 3. Synthesise | Produce answer with article-level citations and cross-references to related provisions |
Capabilities Summary
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Article-Level Q&A | Direct answers grounded in the full regulation text (preamble + 13 Titles) |
| Commission Guidelines | AI system definition, prohibited practices, high-risk, Digital Omnibus |
| EDPB/EDPS Opinions | 2021 joint, 2026 joint, Opinion 28/2024 (AI-DPIA) |
| Codes of Practice | GPAI Code (3 versions), Transparency Code (drafts + overview) |
| FRIA Materials | Art. 27 text + Danish Institute and ECNL practical guides |
| Harmonised Standards | Art. 40 framework, prEN 18286, JTC 21 roadmap |
| Sector Guidance | Banking, medical devices, staffing, healthcare, law enforcement |
| National Implementation | German AI bill, regulatory sandboxes, Member State service desks |
| Incident Templates | GPAI serious incident reporting, Art. 73 high-risk draft |
| Cross-Framework | AI Act ↔ GDPR, ENISA cybersecurity overlays |
Regulatory Basis
| Document | Reference |
|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (full text + recitals) |
| Commission Guidelines | AI system definition, Art. 5 prohibitions, Art. 6 high-risk, Digital Omnibus |
| EDPB Opinion 28/2024 | DPIA for AI processing |
| EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinions | 2021 and 2026 |
| GPAI Code of Practice | Art. 53/55 implementation framework |
| Art. 50 Code of Practice | Transparency labeling framework |
| Art. 40 Harmonised Standards | JTC 21 framework, prEN 18286 |
| ENISA Advisories | AI cybersecurity, standardisation |
License & Disclaimer
This skill provides structured AI Act regulatory information based on Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and official EU institutional sources. It is not legal advice. Specific compliance decisions should involve qualified legal counsel with AI Act expertise.
Licensed under AGPL-3.0.
> Quality assurance: this skill ships with evaluation tests in the evals/ folder, which I run to check its outputs against expected results.
Created by Oliver Schmidt-Prietz — OneZero Legal