Runtime Admissibility Review Skill
Agentic AI governance does not end when an agent is authorized. That was the point of the Agent Authority Charter Builder I recently contributed to Lawve AI. The Charter answers the first question: What was the agent authorized to do before it acted? But in real institutions, authority is not static. Facts change. Policies change. Evidence changes. Risk conditions change. Delegations expire. Escalation triggers appear. Reliance conditions shift. That creates the harder governance question: Even if the agent was authorized, is the action still admissible now? I’m pleased to share that my second Lawve AI skill is now live: Runtime Admissibility Review It helps legal, compliance, risk, audit, operations, and AI governance teams determine whether a specific AI agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible under current authority, scope, evidence, policy, risk, escalation, revocation, and reliance conditions. This is the missing runtime layer. Because agentic AI governance cannot...